You say "potato" and I say "potato" :-) either way it is a significant change to a sensitive part of the core library code just as we are trying to stabilize it. Where's the rush? You could add it in eight days from now without any argument.
Regards, Tim Sergey Dmitriev wrote: > Tim > > this is not a new functionality but the performance improvement. > Specifically for an application server performance. This should not > touch the stability of current Harmony. > > > Thanks > Sergey > > > On Dec 6, 2007 7:19 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Surely this is new function that should wait until the completion of >> this stability drive? >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Author: apetrenko >>> Date: Thu Dec 6 07:52:19 2007 >>> New Revision: 601764 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601764&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Patch for HARMONY-5207 "[classlib][performance] HashMap iterators >>> improvements" >>> >>> Modified: >>> >>> harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/util/HashMap.java >>> >>> harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/util/LinkedHashMap.java >
