Tim Yes, actually there is no big rush. I understand it can be late but anyway: if this fix breaks the stability - feel free to roll it back.
You say "potato" I say "right, probably this is completely potato". :) Thanks Sergey On Dec 7, 2007 8:45 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You say "potato" and I say "potato" :-) either way it is a significant > change to a sensitive part of the core library code just as we are > trying to stabilize it. Where's the rush? You could add it in eight > days from now without any argument. > > Regards, > Tim > > > > Sergey Dmitriev wrote: > > Tim > > > > this is not a new functionality but the performance improvement. > > Specifically for an application server performance. This should not > > touch the stability of current Harmony. > > > > > > Thanks > > Sergey > > > > > > On Dec 6, 2007 7:19 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Surely this is new function that should wait until the completion of > >> this stability drive? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Tim > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Author: apetrenko > >>> Date: Thu Dec 6 07:52:19 2007 > >>> New Revision: 601764 > >>> > >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601764&view=rev > >>> Log: > >>> Patch for HARMONY-5207 "[classlib][performance] HashMap iterators > >>> improvements" > >>> > >>> Modified: > >>> > >>> harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/util/HashMap.java > >>> > >>> harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/util/LinkedHashMap.java > > >
