I prefer to use Harmony specific properties too, after all it's
Harmony's provider.
Sian January wrote:
Hi Regis,
I don't know the ldap area that well, but in my experience some of these
kinds of properties can be quite implementation-specific and therefore
it's not really necessary or helpful to support them in general. However
agree.
I'm not sure what makes more sense if we want to have a property that
essentially does the same thing. I would probably say we should have a
Harmony one because I think that's what people would expect when they're
Yes, I think we would have Harmony specific ones first, then, if there were
strong reasons we could add supports for ri's.
running Harmony, but I don't feel that strongly about it.
Regards,
Sian
On 11/12/2007, Regis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
There are some provider-specific environment properties defined in ri's
ldap provider, such as,
com.sun.jndi.ldap.connect.timeout, com.sun.jndi.ldap.trace.ber
I'm not sure how to deal with these properties, should we support them
for compatibility reason
or we just supply Harmony's provider specific properties, like
org.apache.harmony.jndi.ldap.timeout?
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Best Regards,
Regis.
