<sorry for late reply, just returned from the long trip> FYI, DNS provider implementation from the org.apache.harmony.jndi.dns package uses Harmony-specific property names. But I agree with Tim that for compatibility reasons it would be nice to support both properties sets.
Regards, Alexei 2007/12/13, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sian January wrote: > > Nothing that starts "com.sun" is part of the official spec, although as > > Regis said, in this case it would be possible to implement these > > properties without looking at the code. If we're talking about the general > > case it may not be possible or desirable to do this for other properties. > > For example a property that improves some kind of performance on another > > implementation would be unlikely to have the same effect on Harmony even if > > we did support it, which could be confusing for users. > > Would it be possible to code our implementation to look at > org.apache.harmony properties, then in the Sun compatibility module have > some early init code that copies any value specified as com.som.whatever > to org.apache.harmony.whatever? Just trying to get the best of both > worlds<g>. > > Regards, > Tim >
