+1, make sense IMO. I never liked this mix of '-' and '_' . Regards, Alexei
2008/2/14, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 13 February 2008 at 21:32, "Nathan Beyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone object to normalizing the names of the Ant targets? The > > mixed use of '-' and '_' is starting to push me over the edge. As an > > example, here's the targets available in the top-level of the > > federated build. > > > > build-all build complete implementation > > bundle_src assemble source snapshot > > default setup and build complete implementation > > make-snapshot setup and build complete src + binaries set > > populate_source checkout the class library and VM source trees > > reset removes vm and classlib dirs and resets > > > > I'd like to just use '-' across the board. > > > +1 > > As a low priority, we should also try to be consistent in using names > starting > with '-' for all targets that don't form part of the api and including good > descriptions for those that do. > > > > We can maintain the previous targets for a while via redirects and put > > in some deprecation statements. > > > I would be inclined to have the old targets just fail with a message > containing the new target name. That is, force people to change rather > than letting the depreciated targets work by calling the new targets > automatically. > > Regards, > > Mark. > > >
