We may think of unifying terms as well, e.g. use "src"/"bin" for "bundle-src", "bundle-bin", "populate-src".
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I love unification. From the other side why choose "build-all", > "populate-source", "make-snapshot"? Why not "build", > "populate"/"checkout", "snapshot"/"bundle"? > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nathan Beyer wrote: > > > Does anyone object to normalizing the names of the Ant targets? The > > > mixed use of '-' and '_' is starting to push me over the edge. As an > > > example, here's the targets available in the top-level of the > > > federated build. > > > > > > build-all build complete implementation > > > bundle_src assemble source snapshot > > > default setup and build complete implementation > > > make-snapshot setup and build complete src + binaries set > > > populate_source checkout the class library and VM source trees > > > reset removes vm and classlib dirs and resets > > > > > > I'd like to just use '-' across the board. > > > > LOL +1 > > > > > > > We can maintain the previous targets for a while via redirects and put > > > in some deprecation statements. > > > > nah, just dump them :-) > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > > > -- > With best regards, > Alexei > -- With best regards, Alexei
