Yes Tim, I've also noticed this your commit (that was AFAIU a part of
HARMONY-4569). So here comes an updated stack trace :-)
SEVERE: Error in dependencyCheck
Throwable occurred: java.io.IOException: NUL character in a manifest
at java.util.jar.InitManifest.readValue(InitManifest.java:173)
at java.util.jar.InitManifest.readHeader(InitManifest.java:117)
at java.util.jar.InitManifest.<init>(InitManifest.java:56)
at java.util.jar.Manifest.read(Manifest.java:211)
at java.util.jar.Manifest.<init>(Manifest.java:115)
at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.<init>(JarInputStream.java:66)
at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.<init>(JarInputStream.java:89)
at
org.apache.catalina.util.ExtensionValidator.getManifest(ExtensionValidator.java:373)
at
org.apache.catalina.util.ExtensionValidator.validateApplication(ExtensionValidator.java:184)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4064)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1014)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:736)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1014)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:443)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:448)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:700)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:552)
at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:317)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:295)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:433)
Mar 28, 2008 3:04:08 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
I'm currently looking for the jar file and its manifest that caused the problem.
Regards,
Alexei
2008/3/28, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
> > I just committed code in this area (at r641928) so it may indeed be a
> > regression. Looking...
>
>
> Sorry Alexei, just noticed that your version under test was r640865.
>
> Given the recent changes is it possible for you to retry on a later
> version >r641928 since the failing code has been replaced.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
