Thanks Alexei, I've just committed your patch. However, I've changed the cut&paste manifest a little bit to avoid all possible legal issues.
Regards, Alexei 2008/3/29, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Alexei, Tim, > > I chose not using byte buffers since renaming was suggested first. I > agree that these buffers are easy to be fixed during the next step. > See a solution at [1]. I hope "0.92-gcc" in my test won't be > considered as a cut&paste from the original code, but rather as a > reference to the problematic environment. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5662 > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alexei Fedotov wrote: > > > Ok, I found a way to localize this hack in one place. This requires my > > > ByteBuffer to return an actual ByteBuffer instead of byte[]. This may > > > be an answer to Tim's naming concern. > > > > Care to share it with us? > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > -- > With best regards, > > Alexei >
