It's for verbose info output. "gc.process" is simple enough. Thanks,
-xiaofeng On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that the string "gc.process" is used in many places within the gc > source. Wouldn't it be better to define this in some common include? > > Regards, > Senaka > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
