OK! No issues. On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's for verbose info output. "gc.process" is simple enough. > > Thanks, > > -xiaofeng > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It seems that the string "gc.process" is used in many places within the > gc > > source. Wouldn't it be better to define this in some common include? > > > > Regards, > > Senaka > > > > > > -- > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com >
