This build looks ok for me. So +1
2008/5/14, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 5/14/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/7/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here is r653525 snapshot testing status. Briefly, there are several > > > failures: some of them are intermittent (many in functional suite) > > > and/or known issues (i.e there is JIRA for tracking, some of them are > > > quite old). Also there are several new regressions (sigh, as usual > > > :-() for investigation if they are blockers for M6 or not. > > > > > > Please add your comments and clarifications. > > > > > > > If there are no more comments I'm going to start voting to declare the > > snapshot as M6 milestone build. > > > > The testing cycle for r653525 [1] was completed. And most of test > results were evaluated [2]. > > As usual - there are some issues that should be fixed but none of them > look critical. In case if you think that a particular issue is a > blocker for M6 please speak up. > > So should we declare r653525 build as M6 milestone and unfroze the > trunk for active code development? > > [1] > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r653525/index.html > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > Thanks, > > Stepan. >
