+1

2008/5/14, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This build looks ok for me.
> So +1
>
> 2008/5/14, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 5/14/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > On 5/7/08, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > > Hi all,
> >  > >
> >  > > Here is r653525 snapshot testing status. Briefly, there are several
> >  > > failures: some of them are intermittent (many in functional suite)
> >  > > and/or known issues (i.e there is JIRA for tracking, some of them are
> >  > > quite old). Also there are several new regressions (sigh, as usual
> >  > > :-() for investigation if they are blockers for M6 or not.
> >  > >
> >  > > Please add your comments and clarifications.
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > If there are no more comments I'm going to start voting to declare the
> >  > snapshot as M6 milestone build.
> >  >
> >
> >  The testing cycle for r653525 [1] was completed. And most of test
> >  results were evaluated [2].
> >
> >  As usual - there are some issues that should be fixed but none of them
> >  look critical. In case if you think that a particular issue is a
> >  blocker for M6 please speak up.
> >
> >  So should we declare r653525 build as M6 milestone and unfroze the
> >  trunk for active code development?
> >
> >  [1] 
> > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r653525/index.html
> >  [2] 
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> > Stepan.
> >
>

Reply via email to