On the 0x689 day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote: > [added d...@] > > Egor, > Thanks for asking for review. I miss code exercises. The code looks > ok. BTW, the review took me here [1] - thanks Google for the wonderful > instrument. > > As for your last question, TI appeared in java earlier than > java.lang.instrument. This means implementing the latter using the > former may make some sense. > > [1] > http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=ru#TasP9sO-cIM/trunk/vm/vmcore/src/jvmti/jvmti.cpp&q=load_agentlib&exact_package=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/
Thanks, Alexey! I am totally not an expert in TI, please, correct me. My concern was that in TI mode DRLVM runs slower. One reason to this is that Jitrino.OPT does not support TI. It sounds like a high price to pay for some innocent instrumentations. What can we do about this? -- Egor Pasko
