I believe the task should be modular. It's hard for a student to get all product dependencies.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > In message <94d710af1001261726o9085b91jcef0d7dd95b2c...@mail.gmail.com>, > Sean Qiu writes: >> >> Have someone notice this? Seems that it is time to dicuss our >> potential proposals. > > Yes. Indeed. We should use the wiki again. > > I also think we should consider our selection criteria. My experience > has been that: > > 1) there tends not to be much to distinguish proposals (once you've > excluded the rushed/poor proposals choosing between the rest is > difficult) > > 2) there hasn't been as much interaction as I would like (I'd go as far > as suggesting that a number of failed projects would have passed if they > had done better at this) > > I'd like to try to tackle this by only considering proposals from > individuals that have already had a patch integrated. > > What do others think? (I'm particularly interested to know what past > applicants think.) > > Regards, > Mark > > > > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://www.expressaas.com/ http://openmeetings.googlecode.com/
