In message <201001270826.o0r8qq0a014...@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>, Mark Hindess writes: > > In message <94d710af1001261726o9085b91jcef0d7dd95b2c...@mail.gmail.com>, > Sean Qiu writes: > > > > Have someone notice this? Seems that it is time to dicuss our > > potential proposals. > > Yes. Indeed. We should use the wiki again. > > I also think we should consider our selection criteria. My experience > has been that: > > 1) there tends not to be much to distinguish proposals (once you've > excluded the rushed/poor proposals choosing between the rest is > difficult) > > 2) there hasn't been as much interaction as I would like (I'd go as > far as suggesting that a number of failed projects would have passed > if they had done better at this) > > I'd like to try to tackle this by only considering proposals from > individuals that have already had a patch integrated.
I forgot to mention that I think we should also only consider proposals from individuals that have already filed an ACQ/ICLA. > What do others think? (I'm particularly interested to know what past > applicants think.) I'd still like to know what others thing about my added restrictions? Of course, it doesn't really matter if people disagree with me since as a mentor I can impose conditions on the types of students I want to mentor but if possible I'd like to get broad agreement to make it consistent across all the Harmony proposed projects. Regards, Mark.
