On 07/Jan/2011 06:30, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Yes in early Harmony development, we have an agreement that we will > follow RI's behavior to make Harmony compatible to serve more application as > possible - which includes exceptions etc (unless RI does break spec or is > not logical). So I believe there are many testcases checking such > exceptions. > Jesse, I am not against this proposal, but I wonder if it will be a > large mount of work to split them all (unless we found an automatic > solution, e.g, searching the test source for try-catch).
Same here, no objections and good luck finding them all ;-) Do you (Jesse) have a naming scheme/whatever in mind for the separation so that you can easily avoid them? (cue perennial debate about testing structure/package names/test names/annotations/...) Regards, Tim
