i think i've seen some tests that were written in this style in the first place, using suffixes like ...ExceptionPriority and ...SecurityManager.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 02:40, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/Jan/2011 06:30, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: >> Hi Jesse, >> >> Yes in early Harmony development, we have an agreement that we will >> follow RI's behavior to make Harmony compatible to serve more application as >> possible - which includes exceptions etc (unless RI does break spec or is >> not logical). So I believe there are many testcases checking such >> exceptions. >> Jesse, I am not against this proposal, but I wonder if it will be a >> large mount of work to split them all (unless we found an automatic >> solution, e.g, searching the test source for try-catch). > > Same here, no objections and good luck finding them all ;-) > > Do you (Jesse) have a naming scheme/whatever in mind for the separation > so that you can easily avoid them? (cue perennial debate about testing > structure/package names/test names/annotations/...) > > Regards, > Tim > -- Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
