On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > For gporca it is ok to pre-build them and pass orca installation path to > hawq, but for > pgcrypto and plr, having a script to run before building hawq seems to not > be a good > idea, technically speaking. > > plr/pgcrypto depends on the configure options and configure checking. > (e.g. with and without openssl option in configure, pgcrypto build results > will be different). > > That means building of these features are not 100% independent on building > of hawq.
The above makes sense, but there's way too many ways to interpret the particulars of it. Before we move ahead, how about I take a look at the branch that is being cut (see the other thread) and provide you more technical feedback? Thanks, Roman.
