Hi hawq developers, I am a little confused with the greenplum strings(code, file, comment) inside hawq code base. Does these codes still rely on upstream gpdb? If not, could it possible to rename them with "hawq"?
Also, if these strings are left, as a developer, sometimes I think that the bugs in that forked version of greenplum might also be a issue in latest HAWQ. Another uncomfortable experience is that before running HAWQ, users should source "greenplum.sh". Best xunzhang Send from my iPhone
