Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are maybe already many users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their environment. So we need to think about it.
Regards, Ivan On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old users. I'm not sure > about the details. > I agree that we should change it to a better name in a release. > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Agree . @xunzhang. > > > However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced , but there are > > too > > > many in the code or comments. Changing all of them costs too much > > efforts. > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see is enough. > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may be able to tackle in our > > next Apache release? > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > >
