FYI: I have created the following issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1065
A PR has been created and is available for review: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/pull/922 This completes the outstanding issues related to the Perl Artistic License. Regards, -=e On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 Roman - Sounds like a reasonable approach to declare PL/Perl's ppport.h > file to be exempt. For tracking purposes, I will file an issue and update > LICENSE file with the exception. > > -=e > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> Forking this from the VOTE thread: >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: >> > -1 : The Apache HAWQ incubator project has references to two Apache >> > Category X licenses (Artistic License - licenses/LICENSE-plper.txt: >> > >> > - JSON 2.27 project (src/include/catalog/JSON >> > - licenses/LICENSE-json.txt) >> > - PL/Perl (src/pl/plperl - licenses/LICENSE-plperj.txt) >> >> I see that you already addresses the fact that PL/Perl seems >> to be subject to the exception documented under LEGAL-79. >> >> On top of that, I'd like to add that as it turns out, ASF has never >> formally classified Perl/Artistic license. The most informative >> thread on this can be found at: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-64 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86 >> >> The later one talks specifically about JSON use case as seems >> to be the case for HAWQ. >> >> Given this, I propose that we declare PL/Perl to be exempt (do >> nothing about it). And we refactor JSON out for now. >> >> Sounds reasonable? >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> > > > > -- > *Ed Espino* > *esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org>* > -- *Ed Espino* *esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org>*
