FYI: I have created the following issue:
A PR has been created and is available for review:
This completes the outstanding issues related to the Perl Artistic License.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 Roman - Sounds like a reasonable approach to declare PL/Perl's ppport.h
> file to be exempt. For tracking purposes, I will file an issue and update
> LICENSE file with the exception.
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
>> Forking this from the VOTE thread:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > -1 : The Apache HAWQ incubator project has references to two Apache
>> > Category X licenses (Artistic License - licenses/LICENSE-plper.txt:
>> > - JSON 2.27 project (src/include/catalog/JSON
>> > - licenses/LICENSE-json.txt)
>> > - PL/Perl (src/pl/plperl - licenses/LICENSE-plperj.txt)
>> I see that you already addresses the fact that PL/Perl seems
>> to be subject to the exception documented under LEGAL-79.
>> On top of that, I'd like to add that as it turns out, ASF has never
>> formally classified Perl/Artistic license. The most informative
>> thread on this can be found at:
>> The later one talks specifically about JSON use case as seems
>> to be the case for HAWQ.
>> Given this, I propose that we declare PL/Perl to be exempt (do
>> nothing about it). And we refactor JSON out for now.
>> Sounds reasonable?
> *Ed Espino*
> *esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org>*