Thanks Yi. Cut release branch at early/middle September looks fine.
I would suggest we can add TDE support in the release plan too. Regards, Radar On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Lili Ma <lil...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Yi, > > What's the status of pluggable external storage? > > Also, I wonder whether we can add TDE in next release. > > Thanks > Lili > > 2017-07-25 13:25 GMT+08:00 Vineet Goel <vvin...@apache.org>: > > > Sounds good to me, Yi. > > If there are any other suggestions from other members, those are welcome > > too. > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:14 PM Yi JIN <jinyi.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Vineet, > > > > > > Thank you for your comment, I will add timeline on release page as part > > of > > > the plan. > > > > > > Basically, I expect by 30th Oct., we can have tar balls available for > > > downloading, and before that I reserve about 1.5 month for voting > > progress > > > according to previous experiences. So basically, I think we can cut > > branch > > > for new release at mid Sept. So that means we have no more than 2 > months > > > for fixing and new feature delivery. As delivering pluggable external > > > storage requires some time. If necessary, I think it is ok to move > target > > > date 2 weeks earlier. Does this rough time schedule make sense? What's > > your > > > opinion? > > > > > > I will add Umbrella JIRAS on that page as well. > > > > > > Best, > > > Yi Jin (yjin) > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vineet Goel <vvin...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Yi, > > > > > > > > Thank you for the initiative. I have some feedback that we can > discuss > > > here > > > > and collect further input on. > > > > > > > > a) Putting a timeline on releases (such as October 31st here) may > have > > > some > > > > downsides to the process. My thoughts are that more frequent releases > > > give > > > > users access to features and fixes faster, from a stable branch. > > Release > > > > momentum is good to have in any project. For instance, master branch > is > > > > already 75+ commits ahead of 2.2.0.0-incubating, since that branch > was > > > cut > > > > a a couple of months back. > > > > > > > > b) Also, it may help to add Umbrella JIRAs on that page, associated > to > > > the > > > > new features. If certain features are too large to finish in a given > > > > release, they can always ride the next release vehicle. > > > > > > > > It would be good to hear thoughts from others. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Vineet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:15 PM Yi JIN <y...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Apache HAWQ community, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you guys for your trust, I drafted one release plan for next > > > > version > > > > > 2.3.0.0 that has been update in wiki as below. Please feel free to > > > > comment > > > > > and any input is welcome. Thank you again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HAWQ/ > > Apache+HAWQ+2.3.0.0- > > > > incubating+Release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Yi Jin (yjin) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >