-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/328/#review417
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java
<http://review.hbase.org/r/328/#comment1780>

    i think it's good to retain this option.  once the new load balancer goes 
into place, you'll want it to not run the bulk placement to a small subset of 
the total servers during boot.
    
    could always add a maxWait timeout as well.


- Jonathan


On 2010-07-15 22:42:55, Nicolas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.hbase.org/r/328/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-07-15 22:42:55)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Pseudo-distributed mode for HBase
> 
> * separate processes for Master & RS
> * script to add more RS in a psuedo-distributed cluster
> * script to add backup masters in a psudo-distributed cluster
> * config file that
>   a. explains basic psuedo-distributed mode settings
>   b. shows the extra options to add for running on top of pseudo-distributed 
> HDFS
> 
> Note that I needed to add a GNU Parsing utility to the master + regionserver 
> so I could override certain config values on the fly instead of making 
> seperate config files.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-1511.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1511
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/bin/local-master-backup.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/bin/local-regionservers.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/conf/hbase-site.xml.psuedo-distributed PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java 964686 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java 
> 964686 
> 
> Diff: http://review.hbase.org/r/328/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nicolas
> 
>

Reply via email to