-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#review1566
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1 except for all the crud that you left in the patch... please clean before 
commit (Do tests pass)?


trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#comment5273>

    Remove this message on commit
    



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#comment5274>

    Ugh.  Remove this too.



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#comment5275>

    This too.



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#comment5276>

    This!



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/#comment5277>

    This.


- stack


On 2010-10-18 13:42:36, Ryan Rawson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-10-18 13:42:36)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This fixes multi() to call the batch-versions of Put in HRegion to reclaim 
> performance.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-2985.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2985
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java 
> 1023115 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/MultiResponse.java 
> 1023115 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java 
> 1023115 
> 
> Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1038/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan
> 
>

Reply via email to