-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1254/#review1981
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks great! RB did show some white spaces added unnecessarily, I assume you 
could remove those on commit.

- Lars


On 2010-11-26 02:16:22, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.cloudera.org/r/1254/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-11-26 02:16:22)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> After HBASE-3275 the REST gateway uses Jetty's GzipFilter to will return gzip 
> or deflate encoded content to the client if the client requested it using the 
> appropriate Accept-Encoding header. However Jetty's GzipFilter only wraps 
> output side processing.
> 
> This patch implements a filter that also wraps input side processing, so 
> clients can submit compressed PUT or POST bodies.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-3279.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3279
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/Main.java 54866b6 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/filter/GZIPRequestStream.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/filter/GZIPRequestWrapper.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/filter/GZIPResponseStream.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/filter/GZIPResponseWrapper.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/filter/GzipFilter.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/HBaseRESTTestingUtility.java 
> 5e943ec 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/TestGzipFilter.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1254/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> New unit test, passes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew
> 
>

Reply via email to