-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1252/#review1993
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/KeyValue.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/1252/#comment6297>

    what are all the consequences for not sorting by type when using 
KVComparator?  Does this mean we might create HFiles that not sorted properly, 
because the HFile comparator uses the KeyComparator directly with ignoreType = 
false. 
    
    While in memstore we can rely on memstoreTS to roughly order by insertion 
time, and the Put/Delete should probably work in that situation, you are 
talking about modifiying a pretty core and important concept in how we sort 
things.
    
    There are other ways to reconcile bugs like this, one of them is to extend 
the memstoreTS concept into the HFile and use that to reconcile during reads.  
There is another JIRA where I proposed this.  
    
    If we are talking about 0.92 and beyond I'd prefer building a solid base 
rather than dangerous hacks like this.  Our unit tests are not extremely 
extensive, so while they might pass, that doesnt guarantee lack of bad 
behaviour later on.
    


- Ryan


On 2010-11-26 07:47:02, Pranav Khaitan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.cloudera.org/r/1252/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-11-26 07:47:02)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase, Jonathan Gray and Kannan Muthukkaruppan.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This is a design change suggested in HBASE-3276 so adequate thought should be 
> given before proceeding. 
> 
> The main code change is just one line which is to ignore key type while doing 
> KV comparisons. When the key type is ignored, then all the keys for the same 
> timestamp are sorted according the order in which they were interested. It is 
> still ensured that the delete family and delete column will be at the top 
> because they have the default column name and default timestamp.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-3276.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3276
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/KeyValue.java 1039233 
>   
> trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/KeyValueScanFixture.java
>  1039233 
>   
> trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestStoreScanner.java
>  1039233 
> 
> Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1252/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test cases added. Since there is a change in semantics, some previous tests 
> were failing because of this change. Those tests have been modified to test 
> the newer behavior.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pranav
> 
>

Reply via email to