Hi Stack, That's a start. Let's try it with the CP issue and try to get a report going?
Lars On Jan 21, 2011, at 19:07, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > So, add a tag VERSION_fundamental? E.g. 0.92_fundamental ? > St.Ack > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was assuming it is not easy - a lot of stuff on JIRA is somewhat >> convoluted. But I like the tag idea to flag major work, i.e. that >> would be compiled in JIRA or externally to build the list for the top >> level roadmap. >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I like Ted's suggestion. We could add a tag for >>> "release-wont-happen-w/o-this-fix" and then make custom report. Ain't >>> sure how to make that happen under the roadmap tag in JIRA though. >>> >>> I'll drop 0.20.7. I too don't see any of us pushing it out. I'll >>> weed 0.90.1 a bit too (add stuff back in if I eject something that >>> should be kept in). >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It is possible to do (but a pain) by setting up the smaller tasks as >>>> sub-tasks on major bugs and then only setting the version for the major >>>> bugs. >>>> >>>> I don't like doing that so much since it is fairly intricate. If you have >>>> a >>>> marker for majorness, you can probably build a custom report to do the job >>>> as well. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 on dropping and I like the JIRA based roadmap, but it is somewhat >>>>> hard to read for others. Would there be a way to use super/uber issues >>>>> for the main goals and then add the others underneath? I do not think >>>>> the priority etc. is good for that as a bug fix being a blocker rather >>>>> falls under a "Misc Stability Fixes" etc. I know, sounds like a purely >>>>> bureaucratic request and may be overkill and also not what JIRA is >>>>> for. I am just asking as it would be nice to condense fixes into the >>>>> major goals for a release. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> +1 on dropping 0.20.7 >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:14 PM >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Subject: Re: HBase roadmaps >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I didn't know this view existed in jira. Nice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we can drop 0.20.7. Would anyone recommend its use? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: Stack <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: HBase roadmaps >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 9:55 PM So I edited up the 0.92 >>>>>>>> description. RoadMap looks like this now: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE?report=com.atlassian.jira >>>>> . >>>>>>>> plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Its showing 0.20.7, then 0.90.1, then 0.92.0. You think that right? >>>>>>>> (I wonder if we are going to do a 0.20.7 -- maybe I should drop it?). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
