You want to try it Lars? St.Ack
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stack, > > That's a start. Let's try it with the CP issue and try to get a report going? > > Lars > > On Jan 21, 2011, at 19:07, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, add a tag VERSION_fundamental? E.g. 0.92_fundamental ? >> St.Ack >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I was assuming it is not easy - a lot of stuff on JIRA is somewhat >>> convoluted. But I like the tag idea to flag major work, i.e. that >>> would be compiled in JIRA or externally to build the list for the top >>> level roadmap. >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I like Ted's suggestion. We could add a tag for >>>> "release-wont-happen-w/o-this-fix" and then make custom report. Ain't >>>> sure how to make that happen under the roadmap tag in JIRA though. >>>> >>>> I'll drop 0.20.7. I too don't see any of us pushing it out. I'll >>>> weed 0.90.1 a bit too (add stuff back in if I eject something that >>>> should be kept in). >>>> >>>> St.Ack >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> It is possible to do (but a pain) by setting up the smaller tasks as >>>>> sub-tasks on major bugs and then only setting the version for the major >>>>> bugs. >>>>> >>>>> I don't like doing that so much since it is fairly intricate. If you >>>>> have a >>>>> marker for majorness, you can probably build a custom report to do the job >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 on dropping and I like the JIRA based roadmap, but it is somewhat >>>>>> hard to read for others. Would there be a way to use super/uber issues >>>>>> for the main goals and then add the others underneath? I do not think >>>>>> the priority etc. is good for that as a bug fix being a blocker rather >>>>>> falls under a "Misc Stability Fixes" etc. I know, sounds like a purely >>>>>> bureaucratic request and may be overkill and also not what JIRA is >>>>>> for. I am just asking as it would be nice to condense fixes into the >>>>>> major goals for a release. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 on dropping 0.20.7 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:14 PM >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: HBase roadmaps >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I didn't know this view existed in jira. Nice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we can drop 0.20.7. Would anyone recommend its use? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: Stack <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: HBase roadmaps >>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 9:55 PM So I edited up the 0.92 >>>>>>>>> description. RoadMap looks like this now: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE?report=com.atlassian.jira >>>>>> . >>>>>>>>> plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Its showing 0.20.7, then 0.90.1, then 0.92.0. You think that right? >>>>>>>>> (I wonder if we are going to do a 0.20.7 -- maybe I should drop it?). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
