I put up the patch I used, I then changed the version to 0.20.2-322 and just did ant jar. I crippled the forrest crap in build.xml... I didnt check the filesize of the resulting jar though.
-ryan On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ryan: > Can you share how you built patched cdh3b2 ? > > When I used 'ant jar', I got build/hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar > which was much larger than the official hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar > hadoop had trouble starting if I used hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar > in place of official jar. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am generally +1, but we'll need another RC to address HBASE-3524. >> >> Here is some of my other report of running this: >> >> Been running a variant of this found here: >> >> https://github.com/stumbleupon/hbase/tree/su_prod_90 >> >> Running in "dev" here at SU now. >> >> Also been testing that against our Hadoop CDH3b2 patched in with >> HDFS-347. In uncontended YCSB runs this did improve much 'get' >> numbers, but in a 15 thread contended test the average get time goes >> from 12.1 ms -> 6.9ms. We plan to test this more and roll in to our >> production environment. With 0.90.1 + a number of our patches, >> Hadoopw/347 I loaded 30gb in using YCSB. >> >> Still working on getting VerifyingWorkload to run and verify this >> data. But no exceptions. >> >> -ryan >> >> >
