Is it possible for you to share the hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar that you built ?
Thanks On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote: > I put up the patch I used, I then changed the version to 0.20.2-322 > and just did ant jar. I crippled the forrest crap in build.xml... I > didnt check the filesize of the resulting jar though. > > -ryan > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ryan: > > Can you share how you built patched cdh3b2 ? > > > > When I used 'ant jar', I got build/hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar > > which was much larger than the official hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar > > hadoop had trouble starting if I used > hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar > > in place of official jar. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am generally +1, but we'll need another RC to address HBASE-3524. > >> > >> Here is some of my other report of running this: > >> > >> Been running a variant of this found here: > >> > >> https://github.com/stumbleupon/hbase/tree/su_prod_90 > >> > >> Running in "dev" here at SU now. > >> > >> Also been testing that against our Hadoop CDH3b2 patched in with > >> HDFS-347. In uncontended YCSB runs this did improve much 'get' > >> numbers, but in a 15 thread contended test the average get time goes > >> from 12.1 ms -> 6.9ms. We plan to test this more and roll in to our > >> production environment. With 0.90.1 + a number of our patches, > >> Hadoopw/347 I loaded 30gb in using YCSB. > >> > >> Still working on getting VerifyingWorkload to run and verify this > >> data. But no exceptions. > >> > >> -ryan > >> > >> > > >
