Sounds good. Want to paste your backported patch? St.Ack
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > ... for 0.90, Stack I remember you said you'd hold off until I tested it with > 0.90. I haven't had time yet to test under the profiler up on a test cluster, > but it looks good locally and I did run a major stress test with it in place > and all was well. > > Commit to 0.90 branch I'd say. > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via > Tom White) >
