Oh. Good. I presumed it stale. Thanks D. Applying.... St.Ack
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Dave Latham <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for giving it a try, Andy. It's also been working well for us in > production for 3 weeks now. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3894 already contains a patch > for the branch (concurrentRowLocks-2.patch), unless something has made it go > stale in the meantime. > > Dave > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds good. Want to paste your backported patch? >> St.Ack >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > ... for 0.90, Stack I remember you said you'd hold off until I tested it >> with 0.90. I haven't had time yet to test under the profiler up on a test >> cluster, but it looks good locally and I did run a major stress test with it >> in place and all was well. >> > >> > Commit to 0.90 branch I'd say. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > - Andy >> > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > >> >
