I don't want to be thick, but I don't see where in that jira the fact that createTable became synchronous was stated as an issue. All I see is that it became affected by all the other region in transitions as well, which is orthogonal to our discussion.
J-D On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3744 has been fixed. > > FYI > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Can you point to the issue where Todd did the revert? >> >> Thx, >> >> J-D >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > J-D recently expressed the idea of changing behavior of HBA.createTable() >> to >> > be consistent with its javadoc. >> > Meaning, HBA.createTable() should be synchronous. >> > >> > Todd reported an issue which resulted in reverting my changes that caused >> > HBA.createTable() to be synchronous. >> > >> > I want to see if we can reach consensus on how HBASE 3904 should be >> handled. >> > >> > We have 3 options: >> > 1. making HBA.createTable() to be synchronous in TRUNK >> > 2. pass initial region count in HTD >> > 3. add new method in HBA for synchronous table creation >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> >
