That's my interpretation after reading it again as well. So I will put HBA.createTable() back to being synchronous again for 3904. Cheers On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't want to be thick, but I don't see where in that jira the fact > that createTable became synchronous was stated as an issue. All I see > is that it became affected by all the other region in transitions as > well, which is orthogonal to our discussion. > > J-D > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3744 has been fixed. > > > > FYI > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Can you point to the issue where Todd did the revert? > >> > >> Thx, > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > J-D recently expressed the idea of changing behavior of > HBA.createTable() > >> to > >> > be consistent with its javadoc. > >> > Meaning, HBA.createTable() should be synchronous. > >> > > >> > Todd reported an issue which resulted in reverting my changes that > caused > >> > HBA.createTable() to be synchronous. > >> > > >> > I want to see if we can reach consensus on how HBASE 3904 should be > >> handled. > >> > > >> > We have 3 options: > >> > 1. making HBA.createTable() to be synchronous in TRUNK > >> > 2. pass initial region count in HTD > >> > 3. add new method in HBA for synchronous table creation > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > > >
