+1 to 0.92 as well.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <[email protected]> wrote: > This increases the efficiency of a hbase cluster tremendously. +1 for > committing it earlier rather than later. > > -dhruba > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> It's a big patch but has seen much more testing than the typical and is of >> high quality as you mention. Earlier rather than later I'd say. But then >> let's let 0.92 bake with it sufficiently. >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> >> >> >________________________________ >> >From: Stack <[email protected]> >> >To: HBase Dev List <[email protected]> >> >Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:17 PM >> >Subject: [DISCUSSION] Move hfile to v2 for 0.92 rather than 0.94? >> > >> >Shall we commit the patch at >> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3857 for 0.92? >> > >> >I reviewed it and its high-quality, with lots of new tests, and an >> >attention to self-migration (which it does) that is heartening. >> > >> >I'm +1 on committing it now to TRUNK in time for 0.92 before this fat >> >patch rots our on JIRA. >> > >> >What you lot think? >> > >> >St.Ack >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >
