Hey Ted, we were working on a ticket a few months ago and I was having trouble because I was working with Maven 3 and you said it wasn't supported (or didn't work well).
If that's not the case anymore I'll update the book. On 10/9/11 4:31 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: >The book is already slightly out of date. > >Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty seamlessly. > I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back. > >On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that >>the >> docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only >> thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 ( >> http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1). >> >> I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk >>with >> it >> pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage. >> >> Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs? >> >> Thanks, >> Jesse Yates >>
