Oops... Sorry, the "Ted" in my message was aimed at Ted Yu.
On 10/9/11 6:19 PM, "Doug Meil" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hey Ted, we were working on a ticket a few months ago and I was having >trouble because I was working with Maven 3 and you said it wasn't >supported (or didn't work well). > >If that's not the case anymore I'll update the book. > > > >On 10/9/11 4:31 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>The book is already slightly out of date. >> >>Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty >>seamlessly. >> I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back. >> >>On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that >>>the >>> docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only >>> thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 ( >>> http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1). >>> >>> I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk >>>with >>> it >>> pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage. >>> >>> Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jesse Yates >>> >
