> From: Stack <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:52 PM > Subject: Re: on HBase 1.0 > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> It's possible a release of 0.20.20X (X=5 I think) as Hadoop 1.0 is > imminent. >> >> The Hadoop 1.0 release is an acknowledgement of reality -- 0.20 branch is > in production at many places. >> >> I know we agreed to separate HBase versioning from Hadoop versioning, > but if we continue to number HBase as 0.X after there is a Hadoop 1.0, there > is > an implicit marketing message that we feel HBase is not as ready as Hadoop. >> >> >> I propose that we consider, if and when Hadoop 1.0 is released, that we > release HBase 1.0 off of the 0.92 branch. A subsequent release off of trunk > could be 1.1 or 2.0 at the discretion of the RM and community consensus. >> > > Agreed. Was thinking 0.94 could e be 1.0.0 since its getting a load > of 0.89-fb branch forward-ports. Would have to come out right after > 0.92 though.
Releasing 0.94 as 1.0 like that, for that reason, sounds good to me, but I think that would imply 0.92 is merely a stepping stone to 1.0 aka 0.94. Perhaps that is accurate. - Andy
