> Now that both Hadoop 1.0 and ZK 3.4.2 have been released I think we > should ship with them.
+1 > Apart from that I'm +1. I even let a LoadTester job run on my 15 nodes > during the holidays (287 hours now) and it's still crushing my cluster > as much as it did in the beginning without any failure. +1 too, I had a secure test cluster up over the holiday and it was fine until HDFS was ~95% full. :-) I may have found an issue with how scanner leases are removed and reinstalled in next() with very large regions and slow servers (EC2...) but I haven't been able to recreate the circumstances so don't feel I understand it sufficiently, and anyway this was something seen in a crazy test case. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 3:02 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for > download > > Now that both Hadoop 1.0 and ZK 3.4.2 have been released I think we > should ship with them. > > Apart from that I'm +1. I even let a LoadTester job run on my 15 nodes > during the holidays (287 hours now) and it's still crushing my cluster > as much as it did in the beginning without any failure. > > J-D > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-2/ >> >> I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins. >> >> This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0rc3 and zookeeper 3.4.2rc0. >> >> As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a raft of new features >> including: coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format, >> distributed log splitting, etc. There's been > 600 fixes since > 0.90. >> See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5 >> >> See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this >> release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop >> >> There is no migration necessary. A shutdown and restart after putting >> in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart >> from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work). That said, once you have moved >> to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has >> been made. >> >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0? Take it for a spin. >> Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by January 3rd, 2012. >> >> Happy Holidays. >> Yours, >> The HBasistas >> >> P.S. If you are thinking of going to 0.92 anytime soon, help us out w/ >> the testing if you can. This period while we are putting up release >> candidates is the best time for trying stuff out because if you find >> an ugly bug, it'll be fixed pretty tout de suite >
