> I am similarly concerned about the deadlocks in distributed log splitting > that Jimmy and Prakash have been working on.
> If distributed long splitting is off by default, I'm +1. This seems reasonable. It's going to take some time to shake out all the corner cases. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 3:12 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for > download > > I am similarly concerned about the deadlocks in distributed log splitting > that Jimmy and Prakash have been working on. > > If distributed long splitting is off by default, I'm +1. If it is going to > be default on, then I'd prefer getting those bugs bumped up to > blockers fixed and then spinning another rc. > > Jon. > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> HBASE-5099, 5100 were integrated after this RC. >> Also, Prakash has new patch for HBASE-5081. >> >> I think a new RC should be more appropriate for the first 0.92 release. >> >> Cheers >> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > Now that both Hadoop 1.0 and ZK 3.4.2 have been released I think we >> > should ship with them. >> > >> > Apart from that I'm +1. I even let a LoadTester job run on my 15 > nodes >> > during the holidays (287 hours now) and it's still crushing my > cluster >> > as much as it did in the beginning without any failure. >> > >> > J-D >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for > download: >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-2/ >> > > >> > > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by > jenkins. >> > > >> > > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0rc3 and zookeeper 3.4.2rc0. >> > > >> > > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a raft of new features >> > > including: coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file > format, >> > > distributed log splitting, etc. There's been > 600 fixes > since 0.90. >> > > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5 >> > > >> > > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this >> > > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop >> > > >> > > There is no migration necessary. A shutdown and restart after > putting >> > > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling > restart >> > > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work). That said, once you have > moved >> > > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition > has >> > > been made. >> > > >> > > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0? Take it for a > spin. >> > > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by January 3rd, 2012. >> > > >> > > Happy Holidays. >> > > Yours, >> > > The HBasistas >> > > >> > > P.S. If you are thinking of going to 0.92 anytime soon, help us > out w/ >> > > the testing if you can. This period while we are putting up > release >> > > candidates is the best time for trying stuff out because if you > find >> > > an ugly bug, it'll be fixed pretty tout de suite >> > >> > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] >
