I think we should keep HBASE-5121 in RC4. As Stack acknowledged, 5121 is of importance.
Since Jan. 8th, there have been several bug fixes going into 0.92 branch. RC4 should include them. Cheers On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > I lean towards minimizing the number of patches (maybe just this blocker?). > If we do that we could have an shorter window for this hopefully final > release candidate... > > Jon > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:33 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the update, Stack. > > > > > > Do you want to freeze patch submission to 0.92 branch until you cut > rc4 ? > > > > > > > Its ok. I just tagged rc4. 0.92 branch is open again. > > > > > I think hbase-5153 and hbase-5179 are close to the quality of > > integration. > > > > > > > I don't want to wait nor do I want to have rc4 too different from rc3. > > RC3 almost made it. I'd like rc4 to get pulled out by rc3 good > > feeling. > > > > The above can go into a 0.92.1. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] >
