On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:27 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > The interesting part is that even though the code enforced the atomic > operation to be a for single row, this is not required. > It is enough if all involved KVs reside in the same region. >
So, if a region split post the commit of this x-row transaction, it'd be ok? Or we should just do entity groups altogether and not let region splits happen in middle of an 'entity group'; i.e. we'd split only where the Nth byte of a key changes? St.Ack
