That would certainly be more powerful and useful! Stack <[email protected]> schrieb:
>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:27 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >> The interesting part is that even though the code enforced the atomic >> operation to be a for single row, this is not required. >> It is enough if all involved KVs reside in the same region. >> > >So, if a region split post the commit of this x-row transaction, it'd >be ok? Or we should just do entity groups altogether and not let >region splits happen in middle of an 'entity group'; i.e. we'd split >only where the Nth byte of a key changes? >St.Ack
