I deployed it on a cluster and ran some YCSB and PE, killed some servers. Also I did some local mixings with 0.90.5 to make sure it's all compatible. That's all good.
The CHANGES file is wrong tho, it starts with a 0.90.7 commit and it doesn't have a release date. Not sure if it really warrants rolling out a new RC, I wonder what the others are thinking since in 0.92 we stopped updating it. Finally, 3 days might be a bit short for voting. J-D On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Devs > > HBASE-0.90.6 RC1 is available for download at the following path. > > http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/0.90.6_RC1 > > The following defects are included in this RC > > HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole > HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in > HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTrackers > > HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can miss > memstore edits > HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed when any > of the writer threads has exceptions. > HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397 > HBASE-5269 - IllegalMonitorStateException while retryin HLog split in 0.90 > branch. (Induced defect in 0.90.6RC0). > > HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and > ServerShutdownHandler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting is > completed, causing data loss > > will not go into the release. After good testing and confirmation it will > be committed into future 0.90 and trunk branches. > > Unless we get any defect from the regression of this RC i would like to take > this RC for 0.90.6 release. > > Your suggestions are welcome. > > Please vote +1/-1 for this RC. The vote closes on January 29th. > > Regards > Ram > > > > ________________________________________ > From: Ramakrishna s vasudevan > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: 0.90.6 Release status > > It is always better to get in a patch with test case. But if it takes a > little more time to get the test case can we verify the patch with good > cluster testing and raise a JIRA for the test case integration that Stack > gives. > > By this way we can get the patch in the release and also satisfies Todd's > suggestion. > > Any comments so that i can raise a test task for the same. > > Regards > Ram > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status > > Stack said he would come up with some test for hbase-5179. > Suppose that takes a few more days, do you plan to check in the fix into 0.90 > branch ? > > According to Todd's suggestion earlier, a Jira shouldn't be open for too long > during which time patches continuously get checked in. > > Cheers > > > > On Jan 21, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Devs >> >> After the first RC for 0.90.6 was taken >> HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole >> HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in >> HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTrackers >> >> The above 2 defects have been committed. >> >> HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and >> ServerShutdownHandler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting >> is completed, causing data loss >> HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can miss >> memstore edits >> HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed when >> any of the writer threads has exceptions. >> HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397 >> >> HBASE-5179 - is almost in a final stage for committing. Thanks to Chunhui, >> Ted and Jinchao for persisting on the defect. >> >> The above defects were found during the testing for RC0. Hence i would like >> to cut another RC once the above >> defects goes into 0.90. By tomorrow 22nd January i would like to take a >> release cut. >> Please let me know your suggestions/opinions. >> >> Regards >> Ram
