Count me in for 21st. On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think it would be good to have a swat team for discussing the open > issues > > and planning. In the interest of discussing this while it is fresh in > > everyone's mind, how about setting up a swat team at Cloudera Palo Alto > (210 > > Portage Avenue) soon? > > > > How about either: > > 1) Thursday Feb 16th @ 3:30 PM - 5:30 PM > > 2) Tuesday Feb 21st @ 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM > > +1 for 2/21 > > -Todd > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > It is a good idea to swat team it or hackathon. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Little code has been written at hackathons in the past so it would > >> > need to have a bit of a different format. > >> > > >> > Or we just divvy up the work (I could do the migration of .META. and > >> > -ROOT- to pb and of zk persistence to pb if wanted). > >> > > >> > > >> That's great! > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > We'd like to start with phase 1 at first, then phase 2. > >> > > > >> > > The purpose is to reduce/eliminate the operation interruption. We > need > >> > to > >> > > start from somewhere. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Agree. > >> > > >> > Phase 2 seems just as bad as a disruption as phase 1 or am I reading > >> > it wrong; i.e. its another singularity that can't be crossed w/o a > >> > restart of all servers. > >> > > >> > I suppose I'm wondering if we think we can nail phase 1 and phase 2 > >> > within a single release cycle; then the two singularities are > >> > experienced as one during a single upgrade. > >> > > >> > > >> Yes, if we can finish both in one release cycle. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jimmy > >> > >> > >> > >> > St.Ack > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
