I created HBASE-5394 for porting HADOOP-7379 to HBase FYI
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a copy-paste fork of Hadoop IPC. So, it's easy enough to just > apply the same style patch to our fork of it. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > HADOOP-7379 was marked resolved for 0.23 > > > > Does this imply that hadoop 0.23 or above must be used ? > > If so, we'd better state that on the wiki. > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Sure. I will add that. To me, HBASE-5306 is more about the RPC engine. > >> It can evolve in parallel since the current HBase RPC > >> can support PB already due to > >> HADOOP-7379<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > It's the first bullet under Phase I. > >> > > >> > Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ? > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I posted the proposal on wiki: > >> > >> > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jimmy > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Can you post on wiki ? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Attachment stripped. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang < > [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Hello, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to > work > >> > on > >> > >> the > >> > >> > > wire compatibility issue. > >> > >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, > while > >> it > >> > is > >> > >> > > also easier for developers to > >> > >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up. We'd like to start with > >> two > >> > >> > phases: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase > >> > clusters > >> > >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major > version > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Could you please review? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > Jimmy > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
