5523 is marked for 0.94.

Did I miss something ?

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1
>
> We're running in production with something that's very close to what's
> in this release (those missing are 5552, 5523, and 4890).
>
> I've also been banging quite heavily on what is now 0.92.1 in the past
> few weeks.
>
> Unless a dumb bug creeped in, I'm confident we will be able to call
> this our current stable release.
>
> J-D
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
> >
> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
> >
> > This is for the most part a bug fix release.   Here is what has been
> fixed
> > since 0.92.0:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
> >
> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1?  Take it for a spin.
> > Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
> >
> > Yours,
> > St.Ack
>

Reply via email to