I meant to write 5537
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > 5523 is marked for 0.94. > > Did I miss something ? > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> We're running in production with something that's very close to what's >> in this release (those missing are 5552, 5523, and 4890). >> >> I've also been banging quite heavily on what is now 0.92.1 in the past >> few weeks. >> >> Unless a dumb bug creeped in, I'm confident we will be able to call >> this our current stable release. >> >> J-D >> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/ >> > >> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins. >> > >> > This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been >> fixed >> > since 0.92.0: >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551 >> > >> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC. >> > >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin. >> > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012. >> > >> > Yours, >> > St.Ack >>
