I think HBASE-5942 should be fixed before rolling out 0.92.2 RC. Cheers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Shall we open a jira for investigating the performance issue, and mark it > as a blocker for 0.92.2? > > Enis > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can > try > > and do some poking to see why 92 was so slow. > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported > > > earlier this week? If we have a big perf regression from 0.90 we should > > > probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it. > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes > > > > since 0.92.1: > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12319888 > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Todd Lipcon > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > >
