Any update on the slowness of 0.92 especially for YCSB workload A (50/50 read/write, which shows about 40% regression. A 15/85 read/write work load shows 60% regression)? 0.92 seem fine for pure writes/reads.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can try > and do some poking to see why 92 was so slow. > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported >> earlier this week? If we have a big perf regression from 0.90 we should >> probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes >> > since 0.92.1: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12319888 >> > >> > St.Ack >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>
